Print This Page

Proposed amalgamation of Auburn City, Holroyd City and Parramatta City councils

Holroyd City and Parramatta City Council were both found by IPART to be financially sustainable. Auburn City Council also met IPART’s financial criteria in a seperate merger proposal it submitted.

The government claims a forced amalgamation would see a total financial benefit of $68 million over a 20 year period. This includes a $25 million grant from the NSW government, which artificially inflates the so-called benefit and is paid for by the taxpayer. The alleged ‘saving’ component is $43 million over 20 years and is said to be predominantly achieved through job cuts to council staff.

The government has chosen to release only selected extracts and a high level summary from the study undertaken by its consultants, KPMG to support these alleged savings. It is impossible for the community to make a full submission on the government's financial case for amalgamation without having access to the complete study for each and every council. What is apparent from the publicly information about the KPMG study is that it:

+ inflates any potential savings from future contracting arrangements in amalgamated councils, especially given the councils already enter into many contracts through Regional Organisation of Council contract tenders when there are identifiable economies of scale from doing so

+ assumes large staff losses in the merged council that will inevitably impact on local services an the local economy

+ grossly underestimates the likely costs to councils from renewing each council's IT infrastructure following the merger

+ fails to consider the very real costs the council and local community will incur with a less responsive and larger council that has less intimate knowledge of local needs

+ ignores the large loss of council staff time and resources in implementing an unwelcome and often unsupported amalgamated council, and

+ has no regard to the informed academic opinions based on detailed empirical studies of past council mergers that proves forced amalgamations typically fail to generate financial sustainability for local councils.

It is claimed that the new council will be in a position to use its larger scale and capacity to more effectively advocate for the needs of the communities, this is misplaced as each council already has shared service arrangements where efficiencies can be identifed from doing so.

The proposed merger will increase the ratio of residents to elected councillors to 14,891 residents per councillor, up from 8,545 in Auburn, 9,258 in Holroyd and 12,662 in Parramatta.

Based on international comparisons there is not a good case for making any of these councils any larger. Sydney councils are on average almost four times larger than metropolitan councils across the developed world, with the average population of OECD metropolitan councils 27,224 and the average population of Sydney councils 104,493.


More Detailed Financial Material Relevant To Each Council

There are some significant variations between the figures outlined in the Government's merger proposal and the more accurate figures as reported in the councils' financial statements. There is a difficulty created by the fact that each of the councils involved in this proposal are the subject of two separate merger proposal documents. It is unclear how the actual performance numbers of the existing councils are divided as between the proposals. It is likely to be on a population basis, though there is some inherent inaccuracy in such an approach.

Auburn: According to the government's merger proposal, the operating revenue in 2013/14 was $61.5 million. The actual result was $68.8 million in FY 2012/13 and $66.9 million in FY 2013/14. According to the proposal, the operating result in 2013/14 was $6.1 million. The actual result was $8.8 million in FY 2012/13 and $6.8 million in FY 2013/14. According to the proposal, the asset base in 2013/14 was $428.4 million. The actual asset base was $2.3 billion in FY 2012/13 and $2.3 billion in FY 2013/14. The proposal states that the infrastructure backlog was 5% in 2013/14, which reflects the council’s IPART submission. It does not, however, mention the reduction to 1.9% forecast by 2015/16.  

Holroyd: According to the government's merger proposal, the operating revenue in 2013/14 was $92.5 million. The actual result was $82.1 million in FY 2012/13 and $86.4 million in FY 2013/14. According to the proposal, the operating result in 2013/14 was $0.9 million, which reflects the actual result, though the proposal does not mention that the FY 2012/13result was $2.4 million. According to the proposal, the asset base in 2013/14 was $681.1 million. The actual asset base was $1 billion in FY 2012/13 and FY 2013/14. The proposal states that the infrastructure backlog was 2% in 2013/14, whereas the council’s IPART submission discloses 1.8%.

Parramatta:  According to the government's merger proposal, the operating revenue in 2013/14 was $38.1 million. The actual result was $195.2 million in FY 2012/13 and $201.7 million in FY 2013/14. According to the proposal, the operating result in 2013/14 was $3.9 million. The actual result was $22.8 million in FY 2012/13 and $20.7 million in FY 2013/14. According to the proposal, the asset base in 2013/14 was $131.2 million. The actual asset base was $3.8 billion in FY 2012/13 and $4 billion in FY 2013/14. The proposal states that the infrastructure backlog was 8% in 2013/14, which reflects the council’s IPART submission. It does not, however, mention the reduction to 4% forecast by FY 2013/14/15 and 1.9% by 2018/19 and beyond.